Translate

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

AKC Canine Partners Program Can Be Used by Pet Shops to Sell Puppy Mill Dogs as High Priced "AKC Registered" Dogs


What a shame. We believed in you, AKC!


The AKC Canine Partners Program can easily be co-opted by Pet Shops and their puppy mill cohorts to mislead puppy buyers that their mixed breed and randomly bred "purebred" puppies are "AKC registered" and thus worth asking prices of close to $1,000.

Here is a letter of complaint I sent to the AKC today on this poorly monitored program. Please share this information with your show contacts, public pet owners and AKC reps. Stop in pet stores yourself to check to see if puppies are being offered as "AKC registered" when in fact the seller merely submitted an online Canine Partnership enrollment. Report any misrepresentations to the AKC Investigations and Inspections Department. The AKC will not take action to tighten standards on this program unless they receive reports. 

Letter text:

A relative recently bought a second hand dog that was originally sold from a retail chain pet shop in St. Louis for $900. The seller led the buyers to believe it was an "AKC registered Morkie". On inspection of the certificate, this was found to be a Canine Partnership enrollment. 

I believe this program is seriously faulty in that it allows dogs to be "registered" with no spay or neutering or any other requirements other than a blind sign up through an online form with no proof of identity or enforcement of enrollment requirements. For example, there is no timeline stated for the neutering to be completed and no stated enforcement or penalties (such as revocation of the enrollment) if the dog is not neutered.

Pet stores can use this easy method to sell puppy mill mixed breed and randomly bred purebred dogs as "AKC registered" allowing pet shops to charge hundreds of dollars for dogs that would be worth much less without the implied "AKC Papers".

The AKC should seriously examine its motives in running such a program that is in effect aiding and abetting both profit earning potential of pet shops and puppy mills and also opening a channel for the easy confusion and scamming of puppy buyers who are easily led to believe they are buying an "AKC registered puppy."

It is too easy for an uninformed impulse driven puppy buyer to misconstrue the difference between and "enrollment" and a "registration."

I will be letting everyone in my dog training community and show circles know about this hugely ill considered program and its consequences for the dogs AKC organization supposedly supports.

I believe this program should be immediately brought up for serious review to prevent the misuse of Pet Partnerships as a vehicle that opens the door to potential fraud against uninformed pet shop puppy buyers. 


Thursday, May 2, 2013

Time to Raise the Titling Requirement for New AKC Judges


This post is a copy of my request is in reference to the 2013 AKC Judging Requirements and Approval Process.

Request: To raise the titling requirement from AX/AXJ to MACH/PACH for new judges.

Reason:  The current titling requirement has been in effect since the early days of AKC agility when the Agility Excellent title was the highest agility title and before there existed the Masters level class or an agility championship (MACH).

We did not have the training methods we have today and attaining an AX or AXJ was a significant achievement. 

By today's standards, it is possible to earn an Agility Excellent title without having an in depth understanding of agility training, handling strategies or course design to the extent that today's competitors expect. 

Even with the 5 -year experience requirement, to have only earned an AX/AXJ in that amount of time does not reflect well on the individual's ability and knowledge of agility training, or possibly, their commitment level to the sport. 

A basic level of individual training ability and commitment is important to uphold the stature, relevance and experience base of our judges.

A person acquiring only an AX/AXJ could potentially never have competed -- or to any great degree, or even successfully -- at the Masters Level. They could become a judge without having to have to run for points and double Q's. They might never hae worked to qualify for the Nationals or Invitational. All of these things definitely change the way a team trains and competes, as well as their expectation of courses and judging. 

Most of all, it is fair to expect that our AKC judges to have earned a MACH or PACH  title. With today's training, a MACH/PACH title is considered a high, but attainable goal. It should not be unreasonable to expect that our judges achieve what is generally considered to be the standard for a "made" trainer/competitor in this day and age.  

BREED EXEMPTION 

The only concern I can see with this change is that it could discourage or exclude trainers of certain breeds that do not generally achieve high titles in agility. This is a positive, since it is an advantage to all participants to have trainer/handlers of "non performance" breeds as judges in our sport.

To cover this, I would suggest an exception for any handler:

-  whose SOLE agility competition record has been with breeds that have never achieved a MACH/PACH title, 
-  have XX number of years of continuous agility competition (at least 6 trial days per year)
-  AND have earned an invitation to the AKC agility invitational.

For many non performance breed handlers, a spot at the Invitational is the "Gold Standard" goal and requires focus, training and intention to achieve. 

Limiting this exemption to breeds that have NEVER achieved a MACH/PACH title applies a specific filter for breeds that will or will not be considered (I.e., if someone, somewhere, sometime has earned a MACH/PACH on a certain breed it shows it is a possibility). 

Requiring at least a decade in the sport implies a long experience with training and competing, even if a MACH is not achieved. It also discourages giving exemption to new or uncommon AKC breeds that may be MACH/PACH-capable, but just haven't had enough time for a dog or interested handler to earn a MACH/PACH.  

Requiring that the breed be the SOLE breed that the person has shown rules out those who would "game the system" by running a certain breed for a short time just to qualify for judging when a person has not been able to achieve a MACH/PACH on a MACH/PACH-titled breed.

It might also be allowed that a person receive an exemption if he or she has competed with multiple breeds so long as all of the breeds have never achieved a MACH/PACH.

NOTE:  This should be a difficult exemption to qualify for since many breeds considered by some to be "non-performance" regularly can and do achieve MACHs/PACHS with knowledgeable training and management. (I just saw a Norwegian Elkhound earn a MACH2 at a trial this past weekend!)

Thanks for opening the door to change requests to AKC agility participants and thank you for considering this request. 


Barbara Scanlan
Taylor - 10 yo Papillon -- PNAC PACH2 U-CD (HIT) Wingssong Sweet Baby James CD RE AX AXJ MXP5 MJP7 OFP 
Samurai - 4 yo Papillon -- Wingssong The Seventh Samurai AX AXJ
Shaun - 16 yo Toy Fox Terrier Rescue -- White Pines Little Shaunee CD AX AXJ RE






Wednesday, March 6, 2013

How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love International

In the eery way that cold, cybernetic eye of YouTube has once it gets to know you, it sent me this oddly appropriate video -- just at the time I was preparing to write my post for the Dog Agility Blog Event - "Internationalization". It's called 10 Jahre Agility (1989-1999) - Teil 1 .


A look at the way we were (and might still be if agility never changed)

Ok, so there is something to be said for the laid back ways (potato sack races in clown suits anyone?) and old time fun and comparative civility of the way agility was many years ago.

What wasn't so great? Non-standardized homemade obstacles, unreasonably high jump heights and fuzzy, unclear handling to name a few.

All of these made the "fun" sport of agility a lot harder on dogs. In the early days it was much more common to see lack of connection and communication between dogs and handlers. It was much more common for careers to waste away before they even had a chance to bloom due to dogs checking out and becoming lost to stress related behaviors such as sniffing, zoomies and just plain refusing to run.

My career with my first agility dog, a rescued Toy Fox Terrier named, Shaunie, never jelled because -- at the time -- I really didn't know how to handle, at least in the smooth, consistent and supportive ways we have available to us today.

And that leads to the point of this particular blogging exercise.

That is, change isn't always bad. It is pretty much guaranteed to be uncomfortable, but usually, if you take the time and patience to adjust to it, you'll soon be very grateful of the lessons it allows you to learn.

Take my early days with Shaunie, for example. I really, really struggled to learn front crosses. I hardly ever did them and in the rare times I did, Shaunie acted as if I was a pedestrian popping up unexpectedly in the middle of the Interstate.

I later got better at them with my next dog, Taylor, and it helped open the door to a more liberated and proactive form of handling.

I first caught a glimpse of International style handling when I came across this jaw dropping slow motion video shot at the splendid horror that was the European Open 2010.


Mud, guts and the splendid horror of EO 2010

I mean, what the #%#$? 

In total, it's a view of what can happen when handlers drive for a prize regardless of cost, obviously. The blunt force of the slow motion makes the point in a way that is impossible to ignore.

But also wrapped within the frames are some moments of brilliant handling, the likes of which I'd never seen before. It opened my eyes to the possibilities of a more fluid way of moving. 

I've come to consider this video a pearl that exemplifies the best and worst of this thing we're uncertainly embracing as agility's future.

End of story? Hardly. 

I started shelling out money for seminars, reading blogs and cruising the net for videos that might carry clues to this whole "International' thing. I started doing flagrant blind crosses (even though I really never stopped doing them after they were "banned' years ago).

I asked questions on this blog about a move I uncovered in a Clean Run post by Mary Ellen Barry on something called the "blended cross". I got an answer in a characteristically crystal clear video produced by Linda Mecklenburg. I found and re-posted videos on all kinds of new training techniques.

But here's the rub: I'm not spandex- wearing youngster. And I don't run a big, fleet-footed dog. So what did all of this mean for me?

My current dog is an elegantly moving, yet reactive and not very drivey Papillon named Samurai. He's quick, but not really, really fast. Would knowledge of International handling be beneficial to our little team?

Samurai's happy (and hard earned) running dogwalk. YOLO!

My response is, "Yes."

Please be reminded that this post appears on a blog called View from 4 Inch and the opinions represented here are those of a toy breed handler.

From my grass-blades-high viewpoint, the main difference between how toy breeds run is that they must run more strides (with advantages AND disadvantages), and most significantly, many more strides in extension. I think that's why so many small breed dogs run out of gas halfway through their runs. And why so many big dog training and handling techniques -- with their greater need for training collection -- tend to cause many toy breed dogs to check out, run slow or poop out.

Because of the tight angles of International courses, many of the International tactics are heavily focused on cuing collection. That means I had to adapt the theories I learned to the way my dogs like to run.

So here's some thoughts I've considered in making the transition, and some ideas on how you might start on the journey yourself:

DOs
  • Do try it even if you don't plan on running International style courses. Many techniques, such as the Ketscher turn and blended cross can help you offer clearer collection cues for tight wraps. This gives your dog a better chance to collect in advance of takeoff resulting in a safer landing and turn. Much preferable to shouting "STEP!!" as a dog is landing and it's too late for them to set up a safe and efficient landing.
  • Do use the International trends as an excuse to get yourself and your dog in better shape. It's not just to be stylish, it's better for your health and your dog's safety --  even if you never set a foot on an International course.
  • Do find knowledgeable instruction. Already newbies (at least to International handling) are rushing onto the scenes and into classes offering uninformed instruction. Without understanding the mechanics of something like blind cross handling, students come away with misinformation such as:  a blind cross is an equal substitution for a front cross. Or they might teach "running contacts" without a full exploration of the techniques and effort needed to really build and maintain them. 
DON'TS

  • Don't be a lemming. You know those little furry creatures that jump off a cliff because all their friends did? Yes, try International style, but realize that everyone and every dog is different. For big or fast obstacle focused dogs, a really definite stop gives the best turning cue for the Ketschker or blended cross. However, this didn't work well for my little guys, so after searching out examples of some great little dogs running these turns on YouTube, I discovered that many times, the handlers often continued to show motion while approaching the jump...only backward. I'm not coordinated enough to be a competent backward runner, but I did find that "throwing" the dog backward did make for a nice collected turn -- while still giving him enough of a motion cue to scoot behind the wing.
  • Don't be afraid to experiment. Here's the thing. Many of these "new" handling moves were born spontaneously by great handlers trying to adapt to a situation on course. That the move hadn't been "invented" yet didn't stop them. They did what came naturally and it worked. I've found lately that I've gotten more adventurous about how I communicate with my dog. I'm less likely not to try something because it's not an "official" move. If I feel I have the tools to safely communicate it and it looks like a workable solution, what the heck. YOLO! (Translation: You Only Live Once)
  • Don't stress out. International style handling puts you in close contact with your dog. It's like going on a long car ride with a co-worker. If there's any friction, you're both going to feel it. Be patient with yourself and your team mate during the learning process -- or be prepared for an uncomfortable ride. Once again, don't feel it has to be this or it has to be that. The true beauty of International handling is that it gives you the freedom to improvise in a calculated way. It's kind of like the joy of playing in a jazz band after spending time learning your scales. 

In other words? Damn the torpedoes and bombs away!

So that's my story. Bottom line? Samurai actually prefers and works more consistently with the newer methods than the ones I relied on before. Is our story over? No, I'm not an expert, just an avid learner! 

Let me know how International style is working for you. Especially those with dogs running at 4, 8 and 12 inches. Please share this post if you liked it. If you've got a thought, suggestion or a great video example, leave a comment below!